By: Firm Founding and Managing Partner, William M. Berman, Esq.
Our firm recently had the privilege of trying a case here in San Diego Superior Court for a client who suffered serious personal injuries when she was involved in an automobile accident. The accident occurred at approximately 8:54 a.m. on Halloween morning, October 31, 2010. While sitting at a red-light as a restrained front seat passenger in a vehicle being driven by her husband which was also occupied by their then 2-yr-old son, our client's vehicle was rear-ended at a high rate of speed.
Being 34.5 weeks pregnant at the time, our client was rushed to the hospital with complaints of severe abdominal pain. At the hospital, she was diagnosed by maternal fetal-medicine specialists as having suffered an abruption of her placenta, thereby placing the baby at risk. Within hours of the diagnosis, an emergency caesarian-section surgery was performed. The surgery was successful, however, our client's new-born baby daughter had to stay in the NICU for 10 days so that her lungs could more fully develop.
Following the accident, our client, a former Officer with the U.S. Navy, developed bruising and pain in her lower-back and to her knees. These injuries required six-months of intensive physical therapy, but eventually resolved. More serious, however, she suffered a persistent urinary urge and frequency incontinence. Her medical physicians believed that during the forceful impact, damage had been caused to the nerves that control bladder-function.
Despite admitting liability for causing the accident to occur, the defense disputed our client’s claim that the accident caused the persistent urinary urge and frequency incontinence. At trial, defense counsel argued that the incontinence was not the result of the car accident but rather the result of strains placed upon her uterine floor due to her being a lifetime long-distance runner coupled with her carrying the weight of two pregnancies. Arguing that our client had, at most, suffered the need for an emergent caesarian-section surgery (which they reminded the jury was successful) and the need for six months of physical therapy (for what they called minor “soft-tissue” injuries), the defense suggested that the jury should award plaintiff total damages in an amount between $75,000 and $100,000.
After six days of trial where multiple medical experts were called to testify about our client’s injuries, the jury rendered a verdict in her favor in the amount of $1,018,000. The verdict was especially gratifying in that we sought no money for past incurred medical expenses and only asked for $25,000 for future medical expenses (so that our client could undergo the specific out-patient medical procedure that the medical expert testified she needed to resolve the incontinence). With no lost earnings claim, the bulk of the jury’s $1,018,000 award came in the form of non-economic “pain and suffering” damages ($993,000). The defense never saw it coming.
As trial lawyers, it is gratifying to achieve these kinds of results, and especially for such a great client. In addition to feeling an overwhelming sense of joy for our client, I feel it important to thank my entire staff, and in particular my associate and co-counsel Lukas I. Pick, who all worked tirelessly with me in trying this personal injury case against two very good defense attorneys. In a case where State Farm had rejected our client’s earlier demand of $200,000 to settle the case and avoid trial, we tried the case and obtained an outstanding verdict on her behalf. Three months following trial, our client received a check from State Farm to satisfy the Judgment, which together with prevailing party costs, CCP §998 costs, and legal interests totaled an amount of $1,197,400.76. In sum, State Farm paid nearly $1,000,000 more than the $200,000 demand that our client had offered to settle her case for six months earlier before trial. A truly exceptional woman, our client deserved the jury's verdict and we are extremely happy that she obtained the justice that our legal system was established to provide.





The first step is to report the abuse to the appropriate authorities. Call 911 if the situation is life-threatening. Otherwise, it can be reported to the police and appropriate agencies. For abuse in the community or a hospital, call Adult Protective Services at 1-833-401-0832. For abuse in a nursing home or long-term care facility, contact your local long-term care ombudsman or call 1-888-452-8609.
The next step is contacting a California elder neglect lawyer to help you safeguard your loved one’s rights, investigate the abuse, and hold the facility accountable.
There is no way to determine the exact value of an elder abuse or personal injury case, especially early in your case. However, an experienced attorney can give you an estimated range based on their experience with similar cases.
There are many factors that may influence the value of your case, such as:
Some damages are easy to calculate, such as lost wages and medical bills. Calculating the value of diminished earnings for the rest of your life or future medical needs, however, may require the help of experts. Non-economic damages like pain and suffering have no intrinsic financial value. These damages are challenging to calculate.
If your case goes before a jury, you may potentially be able to recover more than you could through a settlement. However, this introduces a new element of risk: the jury. The circumstances of your accident and even how sympathetic you or the defendant are can influence the outcome.
During your consultation and throughout your case, we will help you understand how these factors influence your case. We will also work tirelessly to document the value of all your damages and pursue maximum compensation on your behalf.




© 2026 Berman & Riedel, LLP. All rights reserved. | Privacy Policy | Terms and Conditions